Allen Frances and the DSM-5

There’s a great (and long) article in the January 2011 Wired magazine profiling Allen Frances, lead editor of the DSM-IV and an outspoken critic of the process by which the American Psychiatric Association (APA) is developing the next version, the DSM-5.  It’s worth a read and can be found here, as it provides a revealing look at a process that, according to the author (somewhat melodramatically, I might add) could make or break modern psychiatry.

I have many feelings about what’s written in the article, but one passage in particular caught my attention.  The author, Gary Greenberg, writes that he asked a psychiatrist (in fact, a “former president of the APA”) how he uses the DSM in his daily work.

He told me his secretary had just asked him for a diagnosis on a patient he’d been seeing for a couple of months so that she could bill the insurance company. “I hadn’t really formulated it,” he told me.  He consulted the DSM-IV and concluded that the patient had obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). 

“Did it change the way you treated her?” I asked, noting that he’d worked with her for quite a while without naming what she had.

“No.”

“So what would you say was the value of the diagnosis?”

“I got paid.”

I include this excerpt because the “hook” here—and the part that will most likely attract the most fervent anti-psychiatry folk—is the line about “getting paid.”  But this entirely misses the point.

See, the DSM-5 is easy to criticize because it seems like a catalogue of invented “syndromes”, from which any psychiatrist can pick out a few symptoms (some of which, I would venture to say, both you and I are experiencing right now), name a diagnosis, and prescribe a medication—and get paid by the insurance company because he believes he is confidently treating a “disease.”  But the truth of the matter, if you talk to any thoughtful psychiatrist, is that, more often than not, the book gets in the way.

In the example above, the doctor had seen his patient for several sessions but hadn’t yet come up with a firm diagnosis.  He settled upon OCD because he was required to write a diagnosis on some form or another.  Yes, ultimately to get paid, but I think we’d all agree that professionals deserve to be reimbursed for their time.  (And if he’s actually listening to his patient instead of comparing her symptoms to a list in a book, his patient would probably agree as well.)

Did this woman have OCD?  Judging by his hesitancy, it’s arguable that perhaps she didn’t have all of the symptoms of OCD.  But she was probably suffering nonetheless, and such presentations are typical of most psychiatric patients.  Nobody fits the DSM mold, we all have quirks and characteristics that present a very complicated picture.  I would argue that this psychiatrist was probably doing well by not rushing to a diagnosis, but instead getting to learn about this woman and develop a treatment plan that was most appropriate for her.

The article’s author writes that if the DSM-5 is a “disaster,” as some observers predict it will be, the APA will “lose its franchise on our psychic suffering, the naming rights to our pain.”  Quite frankly, this could turn out to be the best possible outcome for patients.  If we as a profession ditch the DSM, and stop looking at patients through the lens of ill-defined lists of symptoms, but instead see them as actual individuals, we can better alleviate their suffering.  Yes, a new system will need to be devised to ensure that we can prescribe the interventions that we believe are most appropriate (and yes, to get paid for them), but a patient-centered approach is preferable to a formula-based approach anytime.

Advertisements

16 Responses to Allen Frances and the DSM-5

  1. AA says:

    ""I include this excerpt because the “hook” here—and the part that will most likely attract the most fervent anti-psychiatry folk—is the line about “getting paid.” But this entirely misses the point.""Why do psychiatrists like yourself always have to use the phrase "anti-psychiatry folk" even you claim it is for the purpose of a hook? It is like you're addicted to using that phrase to discredit people who have legitimate complaints. Maybe that should be in the new DSM-IV specifically for psychiatrists:)

  2. Ever heard of Prodromal Anosognosia? I’ve suggested it for DSM-5, and I’ve diagnosed it in myself. (See: http://refusingpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2010/10/dsm-v-proposal.html)

    LOTS of good articles on your blog, btw!

  3. Royal says:

    All indicators point to the idea that fraxel treatments
    has arrived to remain and when anything, it is merely improving
    with time. Information regarding self-help guides can be discussed on the
    list of members so that you can identify the right research methods required.
    It helps people take away the nervous about presenting and public speaking
    using effective techniques. When it’s our very own ‘stuff’, however, it does us well to
    consider our limitations.

  4. What i do not understood is in truth how you are no longer actually
    a lot more smartly-liked than you may be now. You are
    so intelligent. You already know therefore considerably in terms of this matter,
    produced me individually believe it from so many various angles.

    Its like women and men are not fascinated except it is something to accomplish with Lady gaga!
    Your own stuffs outstanding. At all times deal with it up!

  5. The study was published earlier this week I’m revisiting a post titled” Coconut oil can provide potential bioactive compounds for the prescription label. Vitamin D is seo an extremely infectious sickness that is obvious already. J 1987 Keys to health seeking individuals. The spinal column to reestablish its normal curvature and seo structure.

  6. As far as to be less reactive san diego dog trainer or impulsive,
    which is deeply damaged. Oh, God of the two work to
    be for-the-individual or for-the-community? The researchers, adaptive pacing
    group. Hate in the field is predicated on san diego dog trainer strict concepts of authenticity,
    privacy and therapist-patient boundaries.

  7. Please let me know if you’re looking for a writer for your blog.

    You have some really good posts and I feel I would be a good asset.
    If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d really like to write some content for your
    blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please send me an email if interested.
    Kudos!

  8. Dannie says:

    Piece of writing writing is also a excitement, if you be familiar with then you can write
    or else it is complicated to write.

  9. Joycelyn says:

    Cool blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere?

    A theme like yours with a few simple adjustements would really make my
    blog jump out. Please let me know where you got your design. Bless you

  10. If you would like to improve your familiarity simply keep visiting this web site
    and be updated with the newest gossip posted here.

  11. I absolutely lovee yiur website.. Pleasant colors & theme.

    Did you create this site yourself? Please reply back as I’m hoping to create
    my very own website and would love to know where you ggot this from or
    just what the theme is called. Thanks! instagram likes buy
    cheap

  12. Brian says:

    I really like what you guys tend to be up too. This sort of clever work
    and exposure! Keep up the terrific works guys I’ve added you guys to my personal blogroll.
    how do i get real instagram followers

  13. eye wear says:

    What’s up it’s me, I am also visiting this site regularly,
    this web site is actually fastidious and the visitors
    are genuinely sharing nice thoughts.

  14. Even if some classic formal or evening handbags may be laden with shiny flecks, chains and heavy hardware, certain designs prefer the intricate and creative splendor of embroidery.

  15. 시알리스 판매

    Allen Frances and the DSM-5 | Thought Broadcast

  16. Marcus says:

    Just desire to say your article is as surprising.
    The clarity in your post is just nice and i could assume you are an expert
    on this subject. Fine with your permission let me to grab your feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post.
    Thanks a million and please keep up the enjoyable work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: